Second amendment - simple interpretation and explanation

Jun-22-2022 TopLegalMinds Researchers

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution is one of the most controversial and debated topics in America. The amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment was ratified in 1791, and since then, there have been countless interpretations of its meaning.

The Second Amendment is often referred to as the "right to bear arms" amendment. This means that individuals have the right to own and possess firearms for self-defense, hunting, and other lawful purposes. However, there is much debate over the extent of this right and whether it should be restricted in any way.

Some people argue that the Second Amendment only applies to the right to own guns for the purpose of forming a militia. Others believe that individuals have an absolute right to own any type of firearm they choose. This essay will explore the simple interpretation and explanation of the Second Amendment and the various arguments surrounding it.

Historical Background of the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The simple interpretation of this amendment is that individuals have the right to own and carry firearms. However, this interpretation has been the subject of much debate and controversy, especially in recent years.

Colonial Era

The concept of the right to bear arms dates back to England's Bill of Rights of 1689, which allowed Protestants to possess arms for their defense. This right was extended to the American colonies, where firearms were essential for hunting and protection against Native American attacks. The colonists also used firearms to defend themselves against British troops during the American Revolution.

After the Revolutionary War, the newly formed United States faced challenges such as the Whiskey Rebellion and the threat of foreign invasion. This led to the formation of state militias, which were composed of ordinary citizens who were required to provide their own weapons. The Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights to ensure that the federal government could not disarm these militias or infringe on the individual's right to bear arms.

Civil War Era

The debate over the Second Amendment intensified during the Civil War, as both the Union and Confederate armies relied heavily on private citizens to supply their troops with firearms. After the war, the 14th Amendment was added to the Constitution, which granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States and prohibited states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. This amendment was used to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, including the Second Amendment.

Modern Era

In the 20th century, the Second Amendment became a controversial issue as gun control laws were enacted in response to rising crime rates. In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes, such as self-defense in the home. However, the court also stated that the right is not unlimited and can be subject to reasonable regulation, such as prohibiting felons and the mentally ill from possessing firearms.

Today, the debate over the Second Amendment continues, with advocates for gun rights arguing that it is a fundamental constitutional right, while those in favor of gun control believe that it is necessary to prevent gun violence and protect public safety.

The Second Amendment

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is one of the most controversial and widely debated provisions of the document. It reads, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment has been interpreted in many different ways, with some arguing that it guarantees an individual right to bear arms, while others believe it only protects the right to bear arms in the context of a well-regulated militia.

The simple interpretation of the Second Amendment is that it protects an individual’s right to own and carry firearms. This interpretation has been supported by many Supreme Court decisions, including the landmark case of District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. In that case, the Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for self-defense in the home. The Court also noted that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that the government may regulate firearms in certain ways.

Despite this simple interpretation, there are many who argue that the Second Amendment only protects the right to bear arms in the context of a well-regulated militia. This interpretation is based on the wording of the amendment itself, which mentions the need for a well-regulated militia. However, this interpretation has been largely rejected by the courts, which have consistently held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms.

There are also those who argue that the Second Amendment should be repealed altogether. They believe that the right to bear arms is outdated and that it leads to too many deaths and injuries each year. However, repealing the Second Amendment would be a difficult and controversial process, as it would require a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, as well as ratification by three-fourths of the states.

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is one of the most controversial and widely debated provisions in American law. The amendment states that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This simple sentence has been the subject of countless legal battles, political debates, and public discussions. In this essay, we will provide a simple interpretation of the Second Amendment and explain its relevance today.

Simple Interpretation of the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment is often misunderstood and misinterpreted. Some people argue that it guarantees an absolute right to own any type of weapon, while others believe that it only applies to members of a well-regulated militia. However, a simple interpretation of the Second Amendment suggests that it protects an individual's right to own a firearm for self-defense or other lawful purposes. The phrase "the right of the people" in the Second Amendment refers to an individual right, not a collective right. The Supreme Court has affirmed this interpretation in several landmark cases, including District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). These cases held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own a firearm for self-defense in the home.

Relevance of the Second Amendment Today

The Second Amendment remains a highly relevant and contentious issue in American society today. Supporters of gun rights argue that the Second Amendment is essential for protecting individual liberty and preventing government tyranny. They also point to the role that firearms play in hunting, sport shooting, and other lawful activities. Opponents of gun rights argue that the Second Amendment is outdated and no longer necessary in modern society. They point to the high rates of gun violence in the United States and argue that stricter gun control laws are needed to prevent mass shootings and other tragedies. Regardless of one's position on the Second Amendment, it is clear that this provision will continue to be the subject of intense debate and discussion in the years to come. As a society, we must strive to balance the right to bear arms with the need for public safety and security. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." However, there has been a long-standing debate over the meaning of the phrase "well-regulated" in the amendment. Some argue that it implies strict regulation of firearms, while others interpret it as simply meaning "in good working order." In this essay, we will explore the various interpretations of the "well-regulated" clause and its relevance to the Second Amendment.

The Simple Interpretation of the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment is often interpreted as an individual's right to own firearms for self-defense and hunting purposes. This interpretation is based on the idea that the Founding Fathers intended to protect the people's right to bear arms as a means of protecting themselves from both foreign and domestic threats. However, this interpretation does not address the issue of regulation, which is where the "well-regulated" clause comes into play.

A. The Strict Regulation Interpretation

Those who interpret the "well-regulated" clause as implying strict regulation of firearms argue that the Founding Fathers intended for the government to have the power to regulate the ownership and use of firearms. They believe that the government should be able to impose restrictions on who can own firearms, what types of firearms can be owned, and where they can be carried. This interpretation is often supported by the fact that the Founding Fathers themselves regulated the use of firearms in their own time.

B. The Good Working Order Interpretation

On the other hand, those who interpret the "well-regulated" clause as simply meaning "in good working order" argue that the Founding Fathers were simply referring to the need for firearms to be functional and reliable. They believe that the clause does not imply any specific level of regulation, but rather emphasizes the importance of firearms being well-maintained and ready for use when needed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the debate over the meaning of the "well-regulated" clause in the Second Amendment is ongoing. While some interpret it as implying strict regulation of firearms, others believe it simply means "in good working order." Regardless of interpretation, the Second Amendment remains a controversial topic in the United States, with proponents on both sides arguing for their respective positions. Ultimately, it is up to the courts to interpret the amendment and decide on the level of regulation that is necessary to ensure public safety while still protecting individual rights.

The Debate Over the Meaning of 'Militia'

One of the most controversial aspects of the Second Amendment is the phrase "a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State." The debate over the meaning of "militia" has been ongoing since the amendment was first adopted in 1791. Some argue that the term refers to a collective right to bear arms, while others believe it refers to an individual right.

Those who support the collective right interpretation argue that the Second Amendment was intended to protect the right of states to maintain their own militias. They point to the language of the amendment itself, which refers to the necessity of a well-regulated militia for the security of a free state. They also argue that the historical context of the amendment supports this interpretation, as the founding fathers were concerned about the potential for a standing army to threaten the sovereignty of the states.

Those who support the individual right interpretation argue that the Second Amendment was intended to protect the right of individuals to own and carry firearms. They point to the language of the amendment itself, which refers to the right of the people to keep and bear arms. They also argue that the historical context of the amendment supports this interpretation, as the founding fathers believed that an armed populace was necessary to protect against tyranny.

The Debate over the Meaning of 'Keep and Bear Arms'

One of the most contentious issues surrounding the Second Amendment is the meaning of the phrase 'keep and bear arms.' Some argue that the right to bear arms is an individual right that allows citizens to own and carry firearms for personal protection, while others interpret it as a collective right that only applies to members of a well-regulated militia.

Those who support the individual rights interpretation of the Second Amendment argue that the phrase 'keep and bear arms' clearly indicates that the right to own and carry firearms is an individual right. They point out that the phrase 'keep and bear' is used together, suggesting that the right to own firearms is tied to the right to carry them. Additionally, they argue that the use of the word 'arms' indicates that the right to bear firearms is not limited to military use, but rather extends to personal ownership and use.

On the other hand, those who support the collective rights interpretation argue that the Second Amendment only protects the right to bear arms in the context of a well-regulated militia. They point to the language of the amendment, which refers to the necessity of a well-regulated militia for the security of a free state. They argue that the right to bear arms is therefore tied to the need for a militia, and that the amendment does not protect an individual's right to own and carry firearms for personal use.

Ultimately, the debate over the meaning of 'keep and bear arms' is likely to continue for years to come. However, it is clear that the interpretation of the Second Amendment has important implications for gun control laws and the regulation of firearms in the United States. Understanding the various interpretations of the Second Amendment can help us to better understand the ongoing debate over gun rights and gun control in our country.

The Impact of Court Decisions on the Interpretation of the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment has been a topic of debate for many years, with people arguing over its interpretation and what it means for gun control laws. The interpretation of the Second Amendment has been shaped by court decisions over the years, and these decisions have had a significant impact on how the amendment is understood.

History of Court Decisions on the Second Amendment

One of the most significant court decisions on the Second Amendment was the 2008 Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller. In this case, the court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for self-defense purposes. This decision overturned a previous ruling that the Second Amendment only protected the right to bear arms in connection with service in a state militia.

Another important court decision was the 2010 case McDonald v. City of Chicago. In this case, the court held that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments, not just the federal government. This decision extended the protections of the Second Amendment to all Americans, regardless of where they live.

Impact of Court Decisions on Gun Control Laws

Court decisions on the Second Amendment have had a significant impact on gun control laws in the United States. The Heller decision, for example, struck down a District of Columbia law that banned handguns, as it was found to violate an individual's Second Amendment rights. This decision made it more difficult for local and state governments to pass strict gun control laws.

However, court decisions have not completely eliminated the ability of governments to regulate firearms. The Heller decision specifically stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and can be subject to reasonable regulation. This means that governments can still pass laws to regulate firearms, as long as those laws do not infringe on an individual's Second Amendment rights.

Conclusion

Court decisions have played a significant role in shaping the interpretation of the Second Amendment and its impact on gun control laws. While these decisions have extended Second Amendment protections to individuals and limited the ability of governments to pass strict gun control laws, they have also left room for reasonable regulation of firearms. As such, the debate over the Second Amendment and gun control laws is likely to continue for years to come.

Conclusion

After analyzing the Second Amendment, it is clear that the right to bear arms is a fundamental right granted to American citizens. The purpose of the amendment is to ensure that individuals have the means to protect themselves and their property. The Second Amendment is a crucial component of the Bill of Rights, and it is essential to understand its meaning and significance.

There are many debates surrounding the Second Amendment, but it is important to remember that the amendment was written in a specific historical context. The Founding Fathers believed that citizens should have the right to bear arms to protect themselves from government tyranny and to defend their homes and families. While the world has changed significantly since the amendment was written, the fundamental principles behind the right to bear arms remain the same.

It is also important to note that the Second Amendment is not an unlimited right. The government has the power to regulate firearms to ensure public safety. However, any regulations must be reasonable and not infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens to own and use firearms for lawful purposes.

In conclusion, the Second Amendment is a critical component of American society and deserves careful consideration and interpretation. While the right to bear arms is not absolute, it is a fundamental right that must be protected. By understanding the meaning and significance of the Second Amendment, we can ensure that it continues to serve its intended purpose in a changing world.

References

Books

Black's Law Dictionary by Bryan A. Garner
The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies edited by Peter Cane and Mark Tushnet
The Law of Business Organizations by John E. Moye

Journals

Harvard Law Review
Yale Law Journal
Stanford Law Review

Organizations

American Bar Association
International Bar Association
Legal Services Corporation

The Ninth Amendment - A Simple Interpretation

The Ninth Amendment of the United States Constitution is often considered one of the most enigmatic amendments. It is a short and simple statement, yet its meaning has been the subject of debate for decades. The amendment reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This essay aims to provide a straightforward interpretation of the Ninth Amendment and its significance. The Ninth Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution in 1791. It was included to address concerns that the listing of specific rights in the..

Fourth amendment - Simple interpretation

The Fourth Amendment is a crucial part of the United States Constitution, providing protection against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. This amendment was added to the Constitution in 1791, and it has been interpreted in various ways over the years. However, the simple interpretation of the Fourth Amendment is that the government cannot search or seize a person's property without a warrant or probable cause. The Fourth Amendment is often referred to as one of the most important amendments in the Bill of Rights. It protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, ensuring that they have the right..

Fourteenth Amendment - simple interpretation

The Fourteenth Amendment is an amendment to the United States Constitution that was adopted in 1868. It was one of the three Reconstruction Amendments that were passed after the Civil War. The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws, and it has been the subject of many legal debates throughout history. The Fourteenth Amendment is considered to be one of the most important amendments to the Constitution. It was designed to protect the rights of African Americans and other minority groups. The amendment guarantees that all citizens are entitled to equal protection of the law and that no state can deny any person..

The Tenth Amendment of US Constitution - simple interpretation

The Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution is one of the most important amendments that define the relationship between the federal government and the states. It was ratified on December 15, 1791, along with the other nine amendments that make up the Bill of Rights. The Tenth Amendment states that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This amendment is often referred to as the "states' rights" amendment, as it reinforces the idea that the federal government has limited powers and that the states have reserved..

Sixth Amendment of US Constitution - A Simple Interpretation

The Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution is one of the most important amendments in the Bill of Rights. It is a crucial safeguard that protects the rights of individuals accused of crimes in the United States. The amendment guarantees several rights to defendants, including the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to an impartial jury, the right to be informed of the charges against them, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to have legal counsel. The Sixth Amendment was ratified in 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The amendment was added to the Constitution to address the concerns of the Founding Fathers..

7th Amendment - Explained in simple terms

The United States Constitution is a document that outlines the fundamental principles and laws that govern the country. The Constitution is divided into several articles, each of which covers a different aspect of the government and its functions. One of the most important amendments in the Constitution is the 7th Amendment. The 7th Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which is the first ten amendments to the Constitution. It was added to the Constitution in 1791 and guarantees the right to a trial by jury in civil cases. This means that if you are involved in a civil case, you have the right to have your case heard by a jury of your peers,..

What is a Misdemeanor? Explained in Simple Terms

When it comes to criminal law, there are two main categories of offenses: felonies and misdemeanors. While felonies are considered more serious crimes, misdemeanors are still a punishable offense. However, the consequences for misdemeanors are typically less severe than those for felonies. This essay will explore what a misdemeanor is, how it differs from a felony, and the potential consequences of a misdemeanor conviction. A misdemeanor is a criminal offense that is less serious than a felony. Misdemeanors are typically punishable by fines, probation, community service, or a short-term jail sentence. Examples of misdemeanors include petty, ..

What is the homicide - Explanation

Homicide is the act of killing another person. It is a serious crime and is punishable by law. Homicide can be intentional, meaning that the person intended to kill someone, or it can be unintentional, meaning that the person did not intend to kill someone but did so anyway. Homicide is a complex issue that involves many factors, including mental health, social and economic status, and access to weapons. There are different types of homicide, including first-degree murder, second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, and involuntary manslaughter. First-degree murder is the most serious type of homicide and is premeditated, meaning that the..

Trespassing - explanation and examples

Trespassing is an act of entering someone else's property without their permission. It is considered a violation of the law and can result in legal consequences. Trespassing can occur in various forms, including physical trespassing, which involves entering someone's property without permission, and constructive trespassing, which involves using someone's property in a way that is not permitted by the owner. Physical trespassing is the most common form of trespassing. It involves entering someone's property without their permission. This can occur in various ways, including climbing over a fence, jumping over a wall, or entering a building..

Expungments | explanation with examples

Expungement is the legal process of erasing or sealing a criminal record from public view. This means that the record will not show up on background checks, and the person who had the record can legally say that they were never convicted of a crime. Expungements are available in certain situations, but the rules and requirements can vary from state to state. In this essay, we will explore the expungement process and provide examples of situations where expungement may be an option. Expungements can be a valuable tool for individuals who have made mistakes in the past but have since turned their lives around. A criminal record can be a..

Explanation of no contingency fee in Florida

Contingency fees are a common practice in the legal profession. A contingency fee is a type of payment arrangement between a client and an attorney in which the attorney's fee is contingent upon the outcome of the case. In other words, the attorney only gets paid if the client wins the case or receives a settlement. However, in Florida, there are strict rules and regulations regarding contingency fees. Florida is one of the few states that prohibit attorneys from charging contingency fees in certain types of cases. These cases include criminal cases, family law cases, and cases involving personal injury or wrongful death that are brought against..

Felony vs Misdemeanor difference and explanation

When it comes to criminal offenses, there are two main categories: felonies and misdemeanors. These terms are often used interchangeably, but they actually refer to two distinct types of crimes with different consequences. Understanding the difference between felonies and misdemeanors is important for anyone who may be facing criminal charges or who wants to learn more about the criminal justice system. First, let's define what a felony is. A felony is a serious crime that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. Examples of felonies include murder, rape, robbery, and drug trafficking. Felonies are considered the most serious type..

Mechanic Lien - Explanation and Examples

When a contractor or a supplier provides services or materials for a construction project, they expect to be paid for their work. However, there are situations where the property owner fails to pay the contractor, leaving them with unpaid bills. In such cases, a mechanic's lien can be used as a legal tool to recover the unpaid amount. In this essay, we will discuss the concept of mechanic liens, their purpose, and provide examples of how they are used in different situations. A mechanic's lien, also known as a construction lien, is a legal claim that a contractor or supplier can file against a property when they have not been paid for their..

RICO laws - Origin and Explanation

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, also known as RICO, is a federal law that was enacted in 1970 as a tool to combat organized crime in the United States. The law provides for both criminal and civil penalties for individuals and organizations that engage in racketeering activities. RICO has since been used to prosecute a wide range of criminal enterprises, from the Mafia to white-collar criminals. The origins of RICO can be traced back to the 1960s, a time when organized crime was becoming increasingly powerful and sophisticated. The law was a response to the growing concern that traditional law enforcement methods were..

What is the Third Degree Murder Charge and It's Explanation

When a person is accused of murder, the charges against them can vary depending on the circumstances of the crime. One of the most common charges is third-degree murder, which is a type of homicide that is less severe than first and second-degree murder. In this essay, we will explore what third-degree murder is, how it differs from other types of murder charges, and what penalties can be imposed on those who are convicted of this crime. Third-degree murder is also known as "depraved heart" murder or "felony murder." It is defined as a killing that occurs during the commission of a dangerous felony, such as robbery or burglary. Unlike first and..

Third Amendment explained

The Third Amendment to the United States Constitution is one of the lesser-known amendments, but it is still an essential part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment states that "no soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." The Third Amendment was added to the Constitution in response to the Quartering Acts, which required colonists to provide lodging and supplies to British soldiers during the American Revolution. The Third Amendment is often overlooked because it is rarely litigated in court. However, it remains a crucial protection..

22nd Amendment - Everything you need to know.

The 22nd Amendment is a crucial piece of legislation that affects the highest office in the United States - the Presidency. It limits the number of times a person can be elected to the office of President of the United States. The amendment was added to the Constitution in 1951, in the aftermath of Franklin D. Roosevelt's unprecedented four terms in office. In this essay, we will explore everything you need to know about the 22nd Amendment, its history, its implications, and its controversies. The 22nd Amendment was a direct response to Roosevelt's presidency, which lasted from 1933 until his death in 1945. Roosevelt was elected to the..

The 13th Amendment Explained

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified on December 6, 1865, and abolished slavery and involuntary servitude in the United States. It was one of the most significant moments in American history, as it marked the end of a long and brutal chapter of slavery that had defined the nation for centuries. The amendment was a critical step towards the establishment of equal rights for all Americans and paved the way for the Civil Rights Movement of the 20th century. The 13th Amendment was the result of a long and contentious struggle between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. The Civil War, which began in 1861,..

Fifth Amendment - Rights of self-incrimination

The Fifth Amendment is a part of the United States Constitution that outlines several rights that individuals have when facing criminal charges. One of the most well-known rights that the Fifth Amendment provides is the right to remain silent and not incriminate oneself. This right is often referred to as the right of self-incrimination and is a critical component of the American legal system. The right of self-incrimination is essential because it allows individuals to avoid being forced to testify against themselves. This means that if you are facing criminal charges, you have the right to refuse to answer questions that could incriminate you...

The 18th Amendment to the US Constitution Explained

On January 16, 1919, the 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified, prohibiting the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors. This amendment, also known as the Prohibition Amendment, was a result of the temperance movement, which aimed to reduce the consumption of alcohol in the United States. The 18th Amendment was a significant turning point in American history, as it marked the first time that the federal government had used its power to regulate personal behavior. The amendment was passed in response to concerns about the negative effects of alcohol on society, including crime, poverty, and health..

Second amendment - simple interpretation and explanation

Historical Background of the Second Amendment

Colonial Era

Civil War Era

Modern Era

The Second Amendment

Simple Interpretation of the Second Amendment

Relevance of the Second Amendment Today

The Simple Interpretation of the Second Amendment

A. The Strict Regulation Interpretation

B. The Good Working Order Interpretation

Conclusion

The Debate Over the Meaning of 'Militia'

The Debate over the Meaning of 'Keep and Bear Arms'

The Impact of Court Decisions on the Interpretation of the Second Amendment

History of Court Decisions on the Second Amendment

Impact of Court Decisions on Gun Control Laws

Conclusion

People Also Ask: Second Amendment

What is the Second Amendment?

What is the simple interpretation of the Second Amendment?

Why is the Second Amendment important?

Conclusion

References

Books

Journals

Organizations

More articles about: Civil & Human Rights Law

The Ninth Amendment - A Simple Interpretation

Fourth amendment - Simple interpretation

Fourteenth Amendment - simple interpretation

The Tenth Amendment of US Constitution - simple interpretation

Sixth Amendment of US Constitution - A Simple Interpretation

7th Amendment - Explained in simple terms

What is a Misdemeanor? Explained in Simple Terms

What is the homicide - Explanation

Trespassing - explanation and examples

Expungments | explanation with examples

Explanation of no contingency fee in Florida

Felony vs Misdemeanor difference and explanation

Mechanic Lien - Explanation and Examples

RICO laws - Origin and Explanation

What is the Third Degree Murder Charge and It's Explanation

Third Amendment explained

22nd Amendment - Everything you need to know.

The 13th Amendment Explained

Fifth Amendment - Rights of self-incrimination

The 18th Amendment to the US Constitution Explained

Article Categories